Organizational Outcomes and ASP Evaluation

It is important that periodic evaluation be made both of the organizational outcomes and services and support provided by the ASP. Given the newness of the ASP concept, there exists a dearth of studies that have as their primary focus the evaluation of services and support provided by the ASP (Ma, Pearson, & Tadisina, 2005). There is also no agreement among researchers on the ways to define and operationalize quality (Reeves & Bednar, 1994). However, a good starting point is the study of Ma et al. (2005) who identified seven dimensions (features, availability, reliability, assurance, empathy, conformance, and security)
for evaluating the service quality of ASP. Trust is also an issue that may affect ASP choice and usage (Seltsikas, Currie, & Tebbourne, 2002). The task of a small business decision maker is to ensure that the use of the ASP results in net positive outcomes. In addition to quantitative factors such as performance, productivity and usage, we argue that a small business decision maker must use nonquantifiable measures such as culture, satisfaction (with both the process and outcomes) and trust to assess the impact of the ASP.